diff --git a/configs/cot_eval_api.json b/configs/cot_eval_api.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..129d89e --- /dev/null +++ b/configs/cot_eval_api.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "job_type": "cot_eval_api", + "dataset": { + "input_path": "cot_input.json", + "output_path": "cot_output.json" + }, + "inference":{ + "base_url": "ENDPOINT", + "api_key": "TOKEN", + "max_new_tokens": 8196 + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/easydistill/eval/cot_eval.py b/easydistill/eval/cot_eval.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..726050c --- /dev/null +++ b/easydistill/eval/cot_eval.py @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + +# Copyright 2024 Alibaba Group Holding Limited. All Rights Reserved. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +# ============================================================================== + +import json, jsonlines +import argparse +import logging +import os +import re +from tqdm import tqdm +from openai import OpenAI + + +logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format='%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s') + + +def build_cot_prompts(instruction, output): + rv_prompt_template = ( + "You are an expert judge tasked with evaluating the Reasoning Verbosity of a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) " + "for a given problem and its answer. Reasoning Verbosity Evaluation Focus: Assess how well the CoT’s " + "length and step complexity match the problem’s inherent difficulty. An optimal chain is neither " + "missing essential steps nor padded with needless digressions. A simple question should be solved " + "with a brief, direct chain; a challenging one may justifiably require a longer path with reflection " + "and error-checking. Scoring Guidelines (0-9):\n" + "0-1 Minimal verbosity, straightforward expression with little to no elaboration.\n" + "2-3 Clear and concise reasoning with necessary explanations.\n" + "4-5 Moderate verbosity with detailed explanations and thorough reasoning.\n" + "6-7 Extensive verbosity with comprehensive justification and exploration of complex connections.\n" + "8-9 High verbosity with deep, exhaustive exploration of reasoning; involves extensive elaboration, nested justifications, " + "and consideration of counterarguments or alternative perspectives.\n" + "Given Problem, Answer with hain-of-Thought, you will:\n" + "1. Analyze the Reasoning Verbosity\n" + "2. Determine score using the above criteria\n" + "3. Output ONLY the integer score (0-9), place your score in \n" + f"Problem: {instruction}\n" + f"Answer with Chain-of-Thought: {output}" + ) + cd_prompt_template = ( + "You are an expert judge assessing the Cognitive Difficulty of a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) " + "for a given problem and its answer. Cognitive Difficulty Evaluation Focus: The level of " + "reasoning competence required for a model to follow and reproduce the chain faithfully. " + "Judge the reasoning approach, techniques, and overall difficulty. Higher scores correspond " + "to more advanced concepts, abstractions, or multi-layer reasoning patterns. " + "Scoring Guidelines (0-9):\n" + "0-1 Elementary facts or a single trivial operation.\n" + "2-3 Multi-step arithmetic, explicit enumeration, basic rule chaining.\n" + "4-5 Early-undergraduate logic/algebra; one non-obvious insight.\n" + "6-7 Advanced undergraduate techniques (determinants, dynamic programming, layered code reasoning, etc).\n" + "8-9 Graduate-level abstraction, nested proofs, intricate algorithmic analysis.\n" + "Given Problem, Answer with hain-of-Thought, you will:\n" + "1. Analyze the Cognitive Difficulty\n" + "2. Determine score using the above criteria\n" + "3. Output ONLY the integer score (0-9), place your score in \n" + f"Problem: {instruction}\n" + f"Answer with Chain-of-Thought: {output}" + ) + lc_prompt_template = ( + "You are a rigorous logical validator analyzing problem-solving components. " + "Your task is to separately assess the validity of the reasoning process and final solution. " + "Given Problem, Answer with hain-of-Thought, you will:\n" + "1. Verify stepwise logical coherence and soundness\n" + "2. Confirm all critical problem constraints are properly addressed\n" + "3. Check for self-contradictions or unsupported leaps in logic\n" + "4. Verify the process can actually derive the proposed solution\n" + "5. Output ONLY the 1/0 answer (1 for true, 0 for false) for logical correctness, place your answer in \n" + f"Problem: {instruction}\n" + f"Answer with Chain-of-Thought: {output}" + ) + return rv_prompt_template, cd_prompt_template, lc_prompt_template + + +def extract_score(text): + match = re.search(r"(\d+)", text) + if match: + return int(match.group(1)) + else: + return -1 + + +def read_json_fields(filename): + try: + with open(filename, 'r') as file: + data = json.load(file) + return data + except FileNotFoundError: + logging.error("The file was not found.") + except json.JSONDecodeError: + logging.error("There was an error decoding the JSON file.") + except Exception as e: + logging.error(f"An error occurred: {e}") + + +def write_data_to_json_file(data, file_path): + try: + with open(file_path, 'w') as file: + json.dump(data, file, ensure_ascii=False, indent=4) + logging.info(f"Data successfully written to {file_path}") + except Exception as e: + logging.error(f"An error occurred: {e}") + + +def generate_teacher_response_api(data_list, config): + client = OpenAI( + api_key = config["inference"]["api_key"], + base_url = config["inference"]["base_url"] + ) + models = client.models.list() + model = models.data[0].id + logging.info(model) + outcomes = [] + for sample in tqdm(data_list, desc="Call remote model and generating responses"): + instruction = sample["instruction"] + output = sample["output"] + rv_prompt_template, cd_prompt_template, lc_prompt_template = build_cot_prompts(instruction, output) + + def generate_score(sample, model, config): + message = [ + {'role': 'user', 'content': sample} + ] + completion = client.chat.completions.create( + messages = message, + model = model, + max_completion_tokens = config["inference"]["max_new_tokens"] + ) + result = completion.choices[0].message.content + score = extract_score(result) + return score + + rv_score = generate_score(rv_prompt_template, model, config) + cd_score = generate_score(cd_prompt_template, model, config) + lc_score = generate_score(lc_prompt_template, model, config) + if lc_score == 1: + lc_score = True + else: + lc_score =False + + outcomes.append( + { + 'instruction': instruction, + 'output': output, + "reasoning_verbosity": rv_score, + "cognitive_difficulty": cd_score, + "logical_correctness": lc_score + } + ) + write_data_to_json_file(outcomes, config["dataset"]["output_path"]) + + +def infer_with_teacher_model(config): + logging.info('Generating distillation data from the teacher model!') + data_list = read_json_fields(config["dataset"]["input_path"]) + generate_teacher_response_api(data_list, config) + + + +def main(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument('--config', type=str, required=True, help='path to the json config file') + args = parser.parse_args() + config = json.load(open(args.config)) + infer_with_teacher_model(config) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() \ No newline at end of file